top of page

AIG Edition 16

  • Writer: AIG Team
    AIG Team
  • Aug 15
  • 4 min read

Summary: Turkey has signed a military cooperation agreement with Syria. The agreement commits Turkey to providing weapons systems, military training, and logistical support to the Syrian military. This agreement is likely to weaken the Syrian Democratic Forces’ (SDF) resistance to integrating into the Syrian military and will likely push the SDF into cooperation. 

Development: On 14 August, Turkey and Syria signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) as part of a new military cooperation agreement. The MoU aims to coordinate planning, military training, consultation, and information sharing, as well as encourage the purchasing of military gear and related services. The agreement came amid Turkey’s frustration over delays in implementing a March 2025 deal between the SDF and the new government in Damascus, which aimed to integrate Kurdish-led forces into the military. Ankara argues that the SDF has violated the agreement by holding a separatist-leaning conference in Northeast Syria, which Turkey called provocative. Turkish officials have warned that they reserve the right to take military action if the SDF fails to comply and integrate into the military. Meanwhile, Turkey has maintained a military presence in northern Syria and considers the SDF to be an affiliate of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). The SDF has stated it wants to join the Syrian military as a single unit, but the Syrian government has rejected this, stating its fighters must join individually.

Analysis: The Turkey and Syria military agreement is likely to reduce the SDF’s motivation to not integrate into the Syrian military. By strengthening the Syrian military with advanced weapons and training, Turkey is directly improving the state’s capacity to project force and assert authority over territories currently held by the SDF, likely diminishing the group’s motivation to maintain autonomy. Suggesting that the cost of non-integration could now include coordinated military pressure from both Syria and Turkey, the SDF is facing growing isolation and the threat of a better-equipped Syrian military. The SDF is increasingly likely to restart the integration process of the March 2025 agreement. 


[Jacob Faciana]



Summary: The U.S. seized over $700 million in assets linked to President Maduro and raised his bounty to $50 million, the highest ever issued, citing his alleged ties to transnational drug networks trafficking lethal narcotics into U.S. markets. The U.S.’s increased military presence and the seizure of hundreds of millions in Maduro-linked assets are likely to provoke stronger responses from his regime and push the Venezuelan government closer to criminal cartels for financial and logistical support, raising the risk of a major escalation with U.S. forces.

Development: On 13 August, the U.S. seized over $700 million in assets belonging to the Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, along with increasing the reward money on Maduro’s bounty to $50 million, making it the highest bounty the U.S. has ever issued on one individual. The U.S. Department of Justice has tied President Maduro to several transnational drug networks accused of trafficking lethal narcotics into U.S. markets, which has been the major factor in driving the asset seizures and large bounty. Analysts from Insight Crime have stated that more political and financial isolation of Maduro will “indeed lead the Venezuelan government to rely more heavily on organized crime, engage in illicit activities, and further reduce transparency in state management,” according to Insight Crime. The U.S. recently signed a directive to use military assets against drug cartels that are deemed foreign terrorist organizations, along with deploying 4,000 troops to the waters surrounding Latin America. 

Analysis: The U.S.’s heightened military posture and the seizure of hundreds of millions in Maduro-linked assets are likely to provoke sharper responses from his regime, raising the risk of a major escalation with U.S. forces. As U.S. sanctions and asset seizures deepen Maduro’s isolation, the Venezuelan government is increasingly likely to lean on criminal cartels for financial and logistical support. Expanded cooperation between the regime and transnational drug networks would significantly raise the risk of U.S. military intervention. Washington has already signaled a hardened stance by raising Maduro’s bounty to $50 million, seizing nearly $1 billion in assets, and deploying military assets near Venezuelan waters. If Maduro continues to withstand this pressure, the U.S. may view direct military action as its final recourse.


[Unnamed Contributor]



Summary: Baku and Yerevan signed a U.S.-brokered peace agreement in Washington, D.C. that would end the decades-long war between the two nations and position the U.S. as the sole manager of a new trade corridor linking them. The U.S.-brokered peace deal and Zangezur Corridor, coupled with rising American posturing in the Caucasus, will likely push Moscow toward a more flexible stance in Ukraine negotiations, signaling Washington’s intent to exploit power vacuums from the war.

Development: On 8 August, Baku and Yerevan signed a peace agreement that was brokered by the U.S. in Washington, DC. The deal would conclude the decades-long war between the two nations, positioning the U.S. as the sole manager and overseer of a new trade corridor linking the two countries. The proposed Zangezur Corridor would link Azerbaijan to its Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic enclave via southern Armenia. Armenia has agreed to the corridor, along with allowing the U.S. to oversee and manage it with a private military company on a 99-year lease, ensuring fair usage for both sides. Moscow has long projected its influence in the Caucasus, utilizing the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia as leverage to keep the region dependent. Russia’s war in Ukraine has diverted a lot of its attention and resources away from the Caucasus, allowing the conflict to die down and the U.S. to fill the power vacuum.

Analysis: The U.S.-brokered peace deal and Zangezur Corridor agreement with Armenia and Azerbaijan will likely push Moscow to become more flexible in its negotiations regarding its war in Ukraine. Rising U.S. posturing in the Caucasus will likely signal to Russia that Washington intends to exploit the power vacuums created by the war in Ukraine. Russian ally Bashar al-Assad in Syria was ousted by rebel forces in December 2024, with the U.S. playing a key role in filling the resulting geopolitical vacuum. The Caucasus has slipped from Russia’s sphere of influence, likely pressuring Moscow to adopt a more flexible stance in negotiations over the war in Ukraine to stop the geopolitical bleeding. 


[Unnamed Contributor]


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
AIG Edition 15

IRAN: Water Crisis Likely to Increase Tensions with Ankara Over Tigris River Summary: Tehran recently shut down government offices to...

 
 
 
AIG Edition 14

SYRIA: Renewed Ties with Moscow Will Likely Reignite Geopolitical Tensions Summary: Syrian Foreign Minister Al-Shaibani met with his...

 
 
 
AIG Edition 13

ARMENIA: U.S. Control of Corridor Likely to See Iranian Aggression on Regional Assets Summary: The peace deal between Baku and Yerevan...

 
 
 

Comments


Apogee Intelligence Group

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
bottom of page